MMR and Autism: The Continuing Debate

It is said that articles should not be written in thein our youth and we were all fine.
first person. Tosh! I have read so much on MMRThe thing is we were not 'all fine'. Those of us
and measles during the past year that I have towho survived without dying or without the
say something before I scream! I think there is anpermanent side-effects of deafness, blindness,
awful lot of uninformed comment being given airbrain damage or learning difficulties were 'all fine'.
time and newspaper space these days, and thereThose who did not contract meningitis or
is a danger of 'untruths' being believed as fact dueencephalitis were 'all fine'. The rest were not! Then
to most people seeming to believe anything theyagain, it is natural to close our eyes and believe
see or read in the media.that our own experience is the norm. Those who
Here is a brief rundown on three specific items Ibelieve we were 'all fine' did not live through the
read during the week in which I am writing this;dark days prior to vaccination when measles killed
one was on the subject of measles parties. Ichildren every year: it still does, but vaccination
shudder at people's ignorance on this matter.has reduced it to only 410,000 annually. Only
I have two comments to make on what could be410,000?
construed as attempted manslaughter:In fact, the single measles vaccination has been
- If deliberately infecting someone with AIDS oravailable since 1963 and it is probable that today's
HIV is illegal, what is so different aboutmothers, who are making these comments, have
deliberately infecting a child with measles, which isbeen vaccinated against the disease. The single
also a killer disease.vaccination was generally given around 18 months
- If measles parties are becoming more popularin these days, for current parents to have missed
then measles must be becoming more common.it, they would have to be aged around 44.
If not, there would not be so many infectedI do not understand how people can refuse the
children for the uninfected ones to visit!MMR for their children, but be prepared to allow
Q.E.D.! (stands for 'quod erat demonstrandum',them the individual measles vaccine, citing autism
understood these days to mean that the point inas the reason. This is another example of
question has been proven). Measles breedsignorance of the facts.
measles.The facts are that Dr. Andrew Wakefield came
The sad thing about this is that the parentsto his conclusion, he claims, because he found that
genuinely feel that they are doing the best forthe form of measles virus, as found in
their children. So please do not let me hearvaccinations, causes problems in the gut which
anyone say that the MMR debate is trivial or thatreleases toxins into the brain and so causes
parents are silly. They are confused and a lot hasautism. The form of virus, as found in
to do with the amount of misinformation, badlyvaccinations, is different to the wild type of
presented facts and misinformed opinion beingmeasles virus. Therefore, why should the single
disguised as fact. The fact that I disagree withvaccination be any safer than getting it as part of
the views of many parents does not mean that Ithe triple vaccination? It is the measles part of
do not understand them and feel deeply sad thatthe MMR which is claimed to cause the problem!
they feel reduced to deliberately infecting theirIn Japan, where the MMR was stopped for other
child with a disease in order to prevent themreasons, it was found that the rate of autism
getting that same disease. The illogicality of itcontinued to increase at the same rate after the
indicates just how confused they are. Toban as before it.
compound this, it is well known that measles isThat apart, however, Wakefield's evidence has
more dangerous to young children that to adults.been shown to be faulty and the GMC recently
In 2004, 410,000 children under 5 died from theannounced that it is to carry out an investigation
disease.into his professional conduct. Perhaps this is
According to the UK Sutton Guardian on July 6th,partially due to him having an interest in the form
the Sutton and Merton Primary Care Trust givesof patents for individual treatments which would
a MMR vaccination to children at age 12 monthshave required the MMR to have been discredited.
and another at age 15 months. My son was stillI firmly believe that many parents are genuinely
recovering from meningitis 3 months after hisfrightened to death of the MMR vaccine, and
measles vaccination (I still support the MMR sincescared to take the chance of allowing their
measles is worse!).children to have it. I also believe that the
According to the NHS, the national schedule is onevaccination is hugely safer than allowing children to
jab at 13 months and another at 3 years 4take their chances of catching the wild virus
months. Some difference! Sutton Guardiannaturally.
readers will now believe that their child will get 2However, in saying that, I also firmly believe that
MMR jabs in the space of 3 months! No wonderthere are too many vested interests by
parents are nervous. I think what theindividuals, corporations and governments for us
spokesperson meant to say was that theto be able to believe anything they say
vaccination is given between 12 and 15 months,conclusively. Andrew Wakefield had his personal
and that this was a genuine error, but needs toreasons for wanting the MMR vaccine discredited,
be rectified.just as the large drug consortiums have theirs for
It could be argued that this should have beenproving it safe. Governments and health bodies
checked before going to press, but newspaperalso have their own agendas. What chance,
editors are busy people and must expect Healththerefore, does the public have of ever finding
Trusts to know what they are talking about. Ifthe truth. We can only go by evidence and
the Trust concerned gives an explanation of thestatistics, which themselves are open to opinion
policy, or admits that their information is incorrect,and manipulation.
I will add it to my blog. I have had a goodI read the Red Flags webpage occasionally and
response from Nina Jacobs, the Assistant Editorfeel that it has something to offer so long as it
of the Sutton Guardian, and I will no doubt havedoes not allow itself to be taken over by the
something shortly. There has been too muchlunatic fringe. It is a group with good intentions,
misinformation on this important subject for mebut these are too often used as a platform for
to ignore it when I see it. My apologies to thevituperation against the establishment. However, if
Guardian for my fervour on this very serious andyou want as close to a balanced opinion as you
important topic.are likely to get, give it a visit. Just do a search
Another comment I spotted was in an article byon red flags (NOT Red Flag). Make sure you
journalist Victoria Lambert. I quote:include the 's', and I think you will be pleasantly
Some mothers flatly condemned the injection,surprised by what you find.
believing that the risk of contracting measles wasI was.
an acceptable one. The disease had been around